Making the Law Explicit

Neue Publikation:

Matthias Klatt, Making the Law Explicit. The Normativity of Legal Argumentation
European Academy of Legal Theory Series – no. 7 Oxford: Hart Publishing 2008

Wieviel Freiheit hat der Richter bei der Interpretation der Gesetze? Kann diese Freiheit durch den Wortlaut der Gesetze begrenzt werden? Diese Frage ist ein zentrales Thema der rechtswissenschaftlichen Methodenlehre und zugleich ein Problem, das sich in der täglichen Arbeit jedes Juristen stellt. Der Autor verteidigt die Wortlautgrenze gegen dekonstruktivistische Kritik. Robert Brandoms Making It Explicit (1994) wird erstmals auf juristische Grundlagenprobleme angewendet. Der Autor entwickelt ein System semantischer Grenzen, das über bisher bekannte Strukturen weit hinausgeht. Anhand dieser neuen Terminologie analysiert er Gerichtsurteile aus der Praxis. Gegen den Skeptizismus wird die These, dass juristische Argumentation objektiv sein kann, verteidigt. Die Arbeit wurde mit dem European Award for Legal Theory 2002 ausgezeichnet. Sie richtet sich an rechtstheoretisch und sprachphilosophisch Interessierte sowie praktisch tätige Juristen, die von der großen Zahl an Beispielsfällen profitieren.

‘This book represents, on the one hand, a reception of Robert Brandom’s important theory including applications of this theory in the field of legal philosophy and, on the other, an exploration of the limits of an appeal in legal interpretation to the text. The enquiry thereby impinges upon the central juridico-philosophical themes of meaning, objectivity, and normativity. The author’s work counts as a significant contribution to analytical jurisprudence and is deserving of a wide readership.’ Robert Alexy, Professor for Public Law and Legal Philosophy, Kiel.

‘Klatt focuses on a very profound theory of concept formation and uses this theory in a creative way to solve classical problems of legal argumentation.’ Aleksander Peczenik

Download des pdf-Flyers Link zur Webseite des Verlags

Now published:European Academy of Legal Theory Series – no. 7 Making the Law Explicit The Normativity of Legal Argumentation Matthias Klatt Legal argumentation consists in the interpretation of texts. Therefore, it has a natural connection to the philosophy of language. Central issues of this connection, however, lack a clear answer. For instance, how much freedom do judges have in applying the law? How are the literal and the purposive approaches related to one another? How can we distinguish between applying the law and making the law? This book provides answers by means of a complex and detailed theory of literal meaning. A new legal method is introduced, namely the further development of the law. It is so far unknown in Anglo-American jurisprudence, but it is shown that this new method helps in solving some of the most crucial puzzles in jurisprudence. At its centre the book addresses legal indeterminism and refutes linguistic-philosophical reasons for indeterminacy. It spells out the normative character of interpretation as emphasized by Raz and, with the help of Robert Brandom’s normative pragmatics, it is shown that the relativism of interpretation from a normative perspective does not at all justify scepticism. On the contrary, it supports the claim that legal argumentation can be objective, and maintains that statements on the meaning of a statute can be right or wrong, and take on inter-subjective validity accordingly. This book breaks new ground in transferring Brandom’s philosophy to legal theoretical problems and presents an original and exciting analysis of the semantic argument in legal argumentation. It was the recipient of the European Award for Legal Theory in 2002.

‘This book represents, on the one hand, a reception of Robert Brandom’s important theory including applications of this theory in the field of legal philosophy and, on the other, an exploration of the limits of an appeal in legal interpretation to the text. The enquiry thereby impinges upon the central juridico-philosophical themes of meaning, objectivity, and normativity. The author’s work counts as a significant contribution to analytical jurisprudence and is deserving of a wide readership.’ Robert Alexy, Professor for Public Law and Legal Philosophy, Kiel.

‘Klatt focuses on a very profound theory of concept formation and uses this theory in a creative way to solve classical problems of legal argumentation.’ Aleksander Peczenik

Download a pdf flyer. Link to Publisher’s website